|
Hi,
I am also very interested in the questions from the
original post. If you have some additional thoughts in this
subject following your meeting, I'd very much appreciate a summary.
Also, where are good references on emof?
I have been thinking for some months about using
EMF in a similar way as MOF to instanciate the entire UML 1.4 metamodel as an
EMF application. Also for the new UML 2.0. I would expect others at
IBM have looked into this. Any input in the feasibility, or better yet, a
generated UML implementation?
Thanks!
Dave Carlson
Ontogenics Corp.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: [emf-dev] MOF 2.0
Hi Gonzagues,
Thanks for bringing this
attention to us.
There
will be a meeting on this subject next week. We'll
let you know the answer afterwards. Have a nice
weekend! ;-)
Thanks,
===================================================================
Hsin-Liang Huang (hlhuang@xxxxxxxxxx,
vm:hlhuang@ibmusm50)
408-463-3567, T/L 543-3567 Fax:
408-463-3873
|
| "Gonzagues Jacques"
<gjacques@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: emf-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/20/2003 01:57 AM
Please respond to emf-dev
|
To:
<emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: [emf-dev] MOF
2.0
|
Hi,
I have chosen the mailing list to ask my questions
because it concerns
choices that the dev team has or will do.
Here it
is: The OMG has recently adopted a specification for a new version
of MOF
and UML, the version 2.0.
- Are you going to provide an implementation of
the InfrastructureLibrary ?
- Are you going to align emf with emof ? (Since
a large part of the emof
spec come from emf)
- Are you going to provide
support for cmof ?
- Can you give some elements of roadmap for any of the
above
?
Thanks
Gonzagues
_______________________________________________
emf-dev
mailing
list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|
