RE: [egit-dev] any update on JGit @ Eclipse ?

["Sohn, Matthias" <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxx>]

Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Wasn't the suggested solution to have JGit under the EDL?
> 
> Its already under the EDL.
> 
> s/Git Development Community/Eclipse Foundation/ in the current
> copyright notice, and its the EDL.
> 
> The problem is the Eclipse Foundation has never done *pure* EDL
> before.  All current projects not under the EPL are under a dual
> EDL/EPL or APLv2/EPL (only Jetty uses this) license.

Any idea why Eclipse Foundation doesn't like pure EDL ?

> The current legal opinion is that JGit can't be relicensed under a
> dual EDL/EPL license as not all copyright holders consent to having
> the code relicensed under EPL.  Replacing that code is non-trivial,
> its a very large chunk of JGit; perhaps more than 40%.

Do you know which concerns the opposing copyright holders raise against 
dual EDL/EPL license ?