| Re: [ee4j-community] EE4J code conventions? |
FWIW The Science PMC does not impose any code conventions, but I think most, if not all of our projects use the default Eclipse settings. It is simply practical. Best regards, Torkild U. Resheim > 9. apr. 2018 kl. 20:08 skrev Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 2018-04-09 1:40 PM, Markus KARG wrote: >> Can you please also put on the PMC's table that we are at the Eclipse Foundation here, and that Eclipse IDE by default has a different style to what Arjan proposed, and that committers might not be happy with more dictates from the PMC, and that other Eclipse projects also do not share the proposed style…? There is no essential force to have a dictated formatting, so why restrict the commiter's freedom? > To clarify: each PMC is free to decide its own rules. The Eclipse PMC (i.e. our eponymous IDE platform project) has a certain culture and set of rules that has worked for it for many years. I don't think any of the other PMCs (e.g. WTP, Science, IoT, Tools, LocationTech, Polarsys, etc.) at the Eclipse Foundation follow its approach. > In other words, the EE4J PMC is free to decide what is right for its projects. > -- > Mike Milinkovich > mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > (m) +1.613.220.3223 > > _______________________________________________ > ee4j-community mailing list > ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP