Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] Has eclipselink JPA2 Criteria API pom.xml configuration been simplified?

The issue described in the bug looks to be the same issue and fixed in bug:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=345808

The fix will be in the our 2.3 release or you can pick up a nightly build here in the mean time:

http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/downloads/nightly.php

Cheers,
Guy


On 06/06/2011 9:02 AM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
Hello,

Using eclipselink + criteria api has created enough trouble for me that it's worth reconsidering. I expected the generated classes to be generated without speciale configuration (unlike what is shown below) since beside complicating my build (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=328560).

I'm looking for  simpler configurations / alternatives . Thank you.

From my pom http://code.google.com/p/memorizeasy/source/browse/MemoPlatform/persistence/pom.xml:

<plugin>
<groupId>org.bsc.maven</groupId>

<artifactId>maven-processor-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3.7</version>

<executions>
<execution>

<id>process</id>
<goals>

<goal>process</goal>
</goals>

<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<configuration>

<!-- Without this, the annotation processor complains about persistence.xml not being present and fail -->
<compilerArguments>-Aeclipselink.persistencexml=src/main/resources/META-INF/persistence.xml -Aeclipselink.persistenceunits=com.mysimpatico_MemoPlatform-database_nbm_1.0-SNAPSHOTPU</compilerArguments>

<!-- For an unknown reason, the annotation processor is not discovered, have to list it explicitly -->
<processors>

<processor>org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.modelgen.CanonicalModelProcessor</processor>
</processors>

</configuration>
</execution>

</executions>
</plugin>

<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>

<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<inherited>true</inherited>

<configuration>
<compilerArgument>-proc:none</compilerArgument>

</configuration>
</plugin>


http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5148543/has-eclipselink-jpa2-criteria-api-pom-xml-configuration-been-simplified

--
Regards,
K. Gabriele

--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x) < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).

If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈ L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).

_______________________________________________ eclipselink-users mailing list eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users

Back to the top