| Re: [eclipselink-users] improve perfomance using short instead int? |
I would assume no for both.
Arcangel wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm building a Desktop App for Java SE 6 with eclipselink 2.2 and derby
> 10.7.
>
> I have a class like this:
>
> @Entity
> public class Sorteo{
> @Id
> private Integer noSorteo;
> private Integer consecutivo;
> private integer fraccion;
> ...
> }
>
> if I rewrite the class in this way:
>
> @Entity
> public class Sorteo{
> @Id
> private Short noSorteo;
> private Byte consecutivo;
> private Byte fraccion;
> ...
> }
>
> Can I obtain a performance improvement??
> is worth the effort?
>
> thanks for the help.
>
>
-----
http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland
http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/
EclipseLink , http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/
TopLink
Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink ,
http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink
Forums: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink ,
http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink
Book: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence
Blog: http://java-persistence-performance.blogspot.com/ Java Persistence
Performance
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/improve-perfomance-using-short-instead-int--tp31367402p31388582.html
Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.