Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] Possible Bug: @ReturnUpdate drops timestamps from all dates

Thanks James - bug 318532  filed.

Can you point me in the direction on how I'd customize the driver to
use the backwards compatibility mode in eclipselink?  I'm using spring
and c3po, would it have to be done at the datasource level or could I
do it in EL? Changing the oracle data types is not an option -- legacy
system :)

./tch



On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, James Sutherland <jamesssss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The issue is that the returned output parameters are retrieved using
> Statement.getObject(), but on Oracle getObject() for the DATE type returns
> java.sql.Date, getTimestamp() must be used to get the time portion.  This is
> a bug in how EclipseLink retrieves the return row, it should instead be
> using the same code used to access a ResultSet.  Please log a bug for this
> an vote for it.
>
> A solution is to switch your type in Oracle to use TIMESTAMP as DATE in
> Oracle now means only a date, no time.  The JDBC driver also has a backward
> compatibility option to have getObject() return Timestamp.
>
>
> tch wrote:
>>
>> This is very odd,
>> When using @ReturnUpdate to manage a Modified_On column (Oracle Date
>> type). The timestamp is missing from the refreshed object until the
>> container is restarted.
>>
>> It's really odd, I do a save and then a refresh in the refreshed
>> object, and in all future ReadAllQueries even against that object the
>> timestamp is coming back as midnight. This happens on
>> java.sql.Timestamp types as well as java.util.Date with @Temporal and
>> a timestamp.
>>
>> It's funny because it doesn't happen with @ReturnInsert any clue at
>> all, this seems to weird to be an actual bug and I'm not going to rule
>> out user error. Any comments before I file a bug report?
>>
>>
>> ./tch
>>
>>
>
>
> -----
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland
> http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/
>  EclipseLink ,  http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/
> TopLink
> Wiki:  http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink ,
> http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink
> Forums:  http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink ,
> http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink
> Book:  http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Possible-Bug%3A-%40ReturnUpdate-drops-timestamps-from-all-dates-tp28993487p29025207.html
> Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
>


Back to the top