Send eclipselink-users mailing list submissions to
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxxTo subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-usersor, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
eclipselink-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxYou can reach the person managing the list at
eclipselink-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxWhen replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of eclipselink-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: question on Criteria API (Guy Pelletier)
2. RE: EclipseLink 1.2 Planning (Douglas
Clarke)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:58:59 -0500
From: "Guy Pelletier" <
guy.pelletier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-users] question on Criteria API
To: "EclipseLink User Discussions" <
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <
2825CBEC5A5D4FC79B3E32AE2C59976A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Doug,
You can find more documentation on the model generation here:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/UserGuide/JPA/Using_the_Canonical_Model_Generator_%28ELUG%29Cheers,
Guy
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael O'Brien
To: EclipseLink User Discussions
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 2:37 AM
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-users] question on Criteria API
Doug,
Hi,
1) Here is an example generation of "_" java files without corresponding compiled class files (-proc:only) - placed at the cmd root
Depending on your IDE, you will be able to automatically generate these as long as the services file is in your classpath.
javac -processor org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.modelgen.CanonicalModelProcessor -proc:only -classpath
lib/eclipselink.jar;lib/javax.persistence_2.0_preview.jar;punit src/org/eclipse/persistence/testing/models/jpa/metamodel/*.java
....
Note: Building metadata class for round element: org.eclipse.persistence.testing.models.jpa.metamodel.ArrayProcessor
....
2) CriteriaBuilder is the new replacement rename for QueryBuilder in the Oct 2009 API version of JSR-317.
The specification was modified around 7 Oct to use CriteriaBuilder - see the latest PFD version of the spec when it arrives on the JSR site as it started on 22 Sept and has not reached a finish date yet as the final approval ballot was marked on 30 Nov - I would expect it out shortly.
Because of this, on the JSR-317 site - PFD-2 version from 31 Aug 2009 is still listing QueryBuilder as the interface in section 6.3.1 p.199 - this will change.
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/pfd/jsr317/index2.html I checked with my Metamodel issue notes and found the following switch in our codebase...
/trunk/jpa/plugins/javax.persistence/src/javax/persistence/criteria/QueryBuilder.java 5483 deleted
http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/changelog/eclipselink/?cs=5483 /trunk/jpa/plugins/javax.persistence/src/javax/persistence/criteria/CriteriaBuilder.java 5488 (+1456) new
http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/changelog/eclipselink/?cs=5488 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291598 thank you
/michael
Daoqi(Doug) Yang wrote:
I just downloaded EclipseLink 2.0.0 RC1 and have two questions on the Criteria API:
1) Where can I find the documentation on how to generate the static canonical metamodel classes?
2) This version of EclipseLink still has CriteriaBuilder, vs. QueryBuilder as in the JPA 2.0 spec. When will this be changed?
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users/attachments/20091207/8c554089/attachment.html------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:57:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Douglas Clarke <
DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [eclipselink-users] EclipseLink 1.2 Planning
To: EclipseLink User Discussions <
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <b8e97235-9f90-4285-844c-36001ede5977@default>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
Please make sure you add yourself to the cc list of bugs your are interested in so we can discuss the
enhancements within the bug and you are notified of changes made to the bug.
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Hollosy [mailto:
hollosyt@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: December 4, 2009 11:37 PM
To: EclipseLink User Discussions
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-users] EclipseLink 1.2 Planning
I voted for the Validation Support bug. I believe Hibernate already
supports this, I'd like to see EclipseLink stay ahead there.
./tch
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Samba <
saasira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Doug/Peter,
>
> I would want to see the bugs listed below getiing fixed in eclipselink
> 2.1.
>
> Bug 260258 - Add SessionBroker support
> Bug 280949 - Proposed Incubator:
Add Data Partitioning Support
> Bug 241698 - Add Validation Support
> Further, I would also like to see a pluggable cache implementaion support in
> eclipselink 2.1, for which I could not find any bugzilla entry.
>
> These are the features that Hibernate has but eclipselink does not have;
> of course, the feature set of eclipselink is so vast but it is always to
> good to have
> more features, provided people need those features.
>
> I'm interested in contributing to the Bug 280949 if you can give me a few
> pointers.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Samba
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Douglas Clarke <
DOUGLAS.CLARKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> EclipseLink Users,
Contributors, and Committers,
>>
>> We are wrapping up EclipseLink 2.0 now and need to start working towards
>> EclipseLink 2.1 which will be our Helios release in June. We have
>> accomplished a lot in the last year around standards delivering the
>> reference implementation of SDO 2.1.1 and now JPA 2.0 as well as addressing
>> JAXB 2.1 compliance and many advanced capabilities in all areas of the
>> project. Over the next 2 weeks we need to formalize our 2.1 themes and
>> requirements. Peter and I have started a wiki page for this purpose:
>>
>>
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/2.1>>
>> We are asking all interested parties to help us shape what is coming in
>> the 2.1 release as well as future releases by participating in the
process.
>> Please make sure your issues and enhancement requests are captured in bugs
>> with clear descriptions and actionable outcomes. We will be basing our work
>> for this next cycle on the themes we agree upon in an upcoming committer
>> meeting as well as the bug backlog in bugzilla. Make sure if you want an
>> issue addressed that you vote for the bug and/or start a thread on the forum
>> to discuss how the project should address your requirements so that others
>> can become aware of the issue and the bug number so they can vote as well.
>>
>> As always, bugs with patches supplied will be prioritized as we greatly
>> appreciate the additional effort it takes to contribute. All feedback on
>> this process and the project in general is appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Doug Clarke & Peter
Krogh
>> EclipseLink Project Leads
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipselink-users mailing list
>>
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
>
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>
>
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-usersEnd of eclipselink-users Digest, Vol 28, Issue
16
*************************************************
