Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection fiel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?

From: Laird Nelson <ljnelson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:54:20 -0700
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@eclipse.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Qo2lYOkFa06qiQJlrkxZecstRBxgOq0ecfqp6IoVZQU=; b=RPGycFIQl8whsIzhDg9sm+ieuqNrpQme7Rzwfg6YbLMhoNq9a4DcOPXokFBoL5hlWI gElUWOzXfPXSIHar3nMnWV064DrAG67oMVFiHNsDvRDMcwmdgBoeeqrdbl6/Lgibfgfx gueeCib/7XzNkg5S9YW/xbVEfCsFq+tVOIGJg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bpj3tWM/eqR5gIFM9/DtDmBXMxpRaaI+NDeXPtTKvzm0QU/j/t430cdcYHUI5hY3vV 0Ww1KRti8qEydJcoeEXShObjibedRUZ+Th0vUCHKfO6UCa19Bn+ovYHlUH5xO2DPfNXV S/xccYtf8Db3W71rc1KOXtBtfSm+xg/I6+tUU=

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There are some optimizations in EclipseLink (not spec-related), that allow additions to be made to lists without triggering the LAZY relationship.

Thanks, Tom; unfortunately, I have to remain JPA-portable. I may do some silly things with a @PrePersist/@PreUpdate mechanism instead to distinguish newly-added items from existing ones.

Thanks,
Laird

References:
- [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
  - From: Laird Nelson
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
  - From: Tom Ware
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
  - From: Laird Nelson
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
  - From: Tom Ware

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazycollectionfield with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collection field with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] Expected merge behavior in lazy collectionfield with CascadeType.MERGE, PERSIST?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread