Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] EclipseLink 1.1.0

Hi Magnus,

As for TABLE_PER_CLASS, I don't know the answer to that question. 

For the 1:M, here it is:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/JPA2.0/uni-directional_onetomany_mapping

And here is the bugzilla entry for that:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=241414

Hope that helps,

Joen Moreno

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Magnus Heino <magnus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am happy to announce that EclipseLink 1.1.0 is now complete and available for download here:  www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/downloads .

Great! :-)
 

Enhancements in JPA include:
 - a new 1:M mapping without that doesn't require a back pointer or a separate join table to hold the associations.

 - TABLE_PER_CLASS Inheritance has been added giving greater flexibility in how your relational tables associate with the classes in a hierarchy.

Where is this documented?

This page http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_JPA_(ELUG)#.40Inheritance still says that TABLE_PER_CLASS is not supported by EclipseLink. And I cant find anything about the new 1:M mapping...?

/Magnus


_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users



Back to the top