Re: [eclipselink-users] Trouble with EclipseLink-Workbench-codegenerator

[Neil Hauge <neil.hauge@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Heiko,

This is the expected behavior.  The model code generation in the 
Workbench does not use the item type for this purpose.  It is used when 
generating add/remove methods on the Accessors tab.

Neil

Heiko Ahlig wrote:
> Hello...
> ..newbie-question again. ;)
>
> I defined my classes in eclipseworkbench and used collections for 
> something.
> There I also defined the inculded items-class.
>
> For Example:
>
> in the class-xml-file:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <class>
>   <name>de.miku.mappingtest.model.TestSchema</name>
>   .
>   .
>      <class-attribute>
>         <name>objectMap</name>
>         <modifier>2</modifier>
>         <type-declaration>
>            <type-handle>
>               <type-name>java.util.ArrayList</type-name>
>            </type-handle>
>         </type-declaration>
>         <item-type-handle>
>            <type-name>de.miku.mappingtest.model.MyObject</type-name>
>         </item-type-handle>
>         .
>         .
>      </class-attribute>
>
> In the generated TestSchema.java - file is only an unparameterized 
> ArrayList defined:
>
> public class TestSchema {
>   private ArrayList objectMap;
>
> public TestSchema() {
>    this.objectMap = new ArrayList();
> }
>
> public ArrayList getObjectMap() {
>    return this.objectMap;
> }
> .......
>
>
> Do I forget something, that the codegenerator - do not use this  
> infromation for parameterization or is it normaly and  I have to do 
> this by myself?
>
> Greeting
> Heiko
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users