Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?

From: konkere <emperor@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Guy Pelletier wrote:
> 
> A class can not be both a mapped superclass and an embeddable.
> 

ah yes, hibernate allows that while mentioning in the manual: "The same
notion can be applied to @Embeddable objects to persist properties from
their superclasses. You also need to use @MappedSuperclass to do that (this
should not be considered as a standard EJB3 feature though)".

too bad, gonna go back to using hibernate...
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NPE-using-Embedded-ids--tp21565885p21567316.html
Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
  - From: Gordon Yorke

References:
- [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
  - From: konkere
- Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
  - From: Guy Pelletier

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] NPE using Embedded ids?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs