Re: [eclipselink-users] UnidirectionalOneToManyMapping yeesh!

[cowwoc <cowwoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrei Ilitchev wrote:
> 
>> my experience long names are usually a strong indication that something
>> more
>> fundamental is wrong.
> In my experience they are not.
> 

Really? You see nothing wrong with
UnidirectionalOneToManyRelationMaintanenceMode? Doesn't anyone else take
issue with this?

Why can't you integrate this functionality into the existing OneToMany? Why
can't you create a new OneToMany in a different package name? Why can't you
use nested classes to break this down into smaller components? There are
countless different ways to improve upon this.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/UnidirectionalOneToManyMapping-yeesh%21-tp20254023p20269392.html
Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.