[eclipselink-users] Are lifecycle methods supposed to be called from a M

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[eclipselink-users] Are lifecycle methods supposed to be called from a MappedSuperClass?

From: "Tim Hollosy" <hollosyt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 11:03:02 -0400
Delivered-to: eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gKm7XZG0P/64ywS8QsRRklILtT9ShTE5y/K5WXEgEjS6TroRYdouUHXmJhB2/EmZN1bet7FHLzkuv/mI4eLldqiyYz9MufJBAWySuA94XDy+K2XOQSzJZA0j9GDgrMWnbIBxu+tN0n7r1Q0xH3LdCgLGi4Gv6z4Fil7btfc/NS4=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-users>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users>, <mailto:eclipselink-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I noticed that the only way I could get lifecycle methods to be called
from a MappedSuperClass was to add them to an EntityListener attached
to the MappedSuperclass.

Is this by design in JPA or is it an EclipseLink bug?

-- 
./tch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipselink-users] Are lifecycle methods supposed to be calledfrom a MappedSuperClass?
  - From: Guy Pelletier

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] named query + skip null parameters
Next by Date: Re: [eclipselink-users] Are lifecycle methods supposed to be calledfrom a MappedSuperClass?
Previous by thread: [eclipselink-users] named query + skip null parameters
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-users] Are lifecycle methods supposed to be calledfrom a MappedSuperClass?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs