Hi Bryan,
I've read the bugs and am adding some comments but it looks like
you're coming at this from an Equinox-centric perspective. What I mean
is you are proposing features that rely on the Equinox extensions
mechanism. This isn't a problem but can you change the bug names to
replace "OSGi" with "Equinox" so we can differentiate between generic
features and implementation specific features?
Maybe you can create a wiki page under
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/OSGi to provide an
overview and example of how all these features you're proposing fit
together in an application?
Thanks,
Shaun
Bryan Hunt wrote:
Shaun and other EclipseLink gurus, here are links to my
proposed contributions:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226421
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226425
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226426
Bryan
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
--
Shaun Smith | Principal Product Manager, TopLink |
+1.905.502.3094
Oracle Fusion Middleware
110 Matheson Boulevard West, Suite 100
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5R 3P4
|
