[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-dev] [External] : Re: EclipseLink 2.7.9 (Final) release
|
Hi Arjan,
I hope, that next week we will release 3.0.2 final. Lukas is out of office this week.
I think, that on the beginning after merge
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/pull/1183 (still not approved)
and maybe
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/pull/1198
we will release 3.0.2-RC2
and at the end 3.0.2 Final
Thank You
Radek
On 7/4/21 11:39 PM, arjan tijms wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering, it seems the 3.x release is still at 3.0.2-RC1. What are the plans for 3.0.2 final?
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:53 PM William Dazey <dazeydev.3@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:dazeydev.3@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 2:46 AM Radek Felcman <radek.felcman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:radek.felcman@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> But as understand Your question leads into org.eclipse.persistence.asm*.jar naming .
> I see there two options:
> 1. Keep there naming without qualifier "org.eclipse.persistence.asm.jar" because it is used/consumed as a 3rd party dependency from 2.7.9?
> 2. Change file name into previous format e.g. "org.eclipse.persistence.asm_9.0.0.v202010211629.jar" ?
I would prefer any bundle to have a qualifier on the end that is
consistent with the other similar bundles. If there is a good reason
for ASM NOT to have a qualifier, then I am going to ask why does ANTRL
get a qualifier? Both are thirdparty dependencies, yes? I prefer we
default to consistency rather than exception, unless there is a good
reason for a change.
eclipselink-plugins-2.7.9.v20210604-2c549e2208
```
org.eclipse.persistence.antlr_3.5.2.v201711011707.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.asm.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.core_2.7.9.v20210604-2c549e2208.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.jpql_2.7.9.v20210604-2c549e2208.jar
```
eclipselink-plugins-2.7.8.v20201217-ecdf3c32c4
```
org.eclipse.persistence.antlr_3.5.2.v201711011707.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.asm_9.0.0.v202010211629.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.core_2.7.8.v20201217-ecdf3c32c4.jar
org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.jpql_2.7.8.v20201217-ecdf3c32c4.jar
```
It is a convenience to have a qualifier on the end of the bundle, but
I just want to make sure this difference is seen and investigated. I
vote for adding a qualifier.
> About 3.0.2 release:
> Did You find some time to check:
> Lukas PR https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/pull/1182
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/pull/1182__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!fd74gjMrFkaTfC87ZiY4oMKjPZHj9OpZhWqDsMn7lA6Bkbth-D5QxWD1SFXolTZyQTA$>
> and My PR https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/pull/1183
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink/pull/1183__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!fd74gjMrFkaTfC87ZiY4oMKjPZHj9OpZhWqDsMn7lA6Bkbth-D5QxWD1SFXo0aGAcqE$>
> We'd like to know Your opinion about this (which modification You prefer).
I won't lie, I'm not a maven expert and I don't know which changes are
appropriate. Are these competing PRs meant to fix a specific issue I
mentioned? Reading the descriptions for both, I am not sure what the
purpose of the changes are or what I can review to verify the changes
look correct. I would appreciate a layman explanation with a before vs
after comparison if possible. Sorry.
Thanks,
Will Dazey
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-dev mailing list
eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!fd74gjMrFkaTfC87ZiY4oMKjPZHj9OpZhWqDsMn7lA6Bkbth-D5QxWD1SFXoZfWiAb0$>
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-dev mailing list
eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!fd74gjMrFkaTfC87ZiY4oMKjPZHj9OpZhWqDsMn7lA6Bkbth-D5QxWD1SFXoZfWiAb0$