[eclipselink-dev] Proposed changes to Dynamic Persistence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[eclipselink-dev] Proposed changes to Dynamic Persistence

From: Mike Norman <michael.norman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 13:52:58 -0400
Delivered-to: eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipselink-dev>
List-help: <mailto:eclipselink-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev>, <mailto:eclipselink-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev>, <mailto:eclipselink-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Oracle Corp.
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)

In bug 280667 - and its accompanying wiki page - I describe some proposed changes to EclipseLink core
Dynamic Persistence (a patch is attach'd to the bug)

The main change to public behaviour is the semantics of 'isSet' - in order to prepare for future work on
sparse merge, the behaviour of 'isSet' changes to mimic that of SDO (NB - the proposed changes are
not a separate impl of sparse merge - that is being handled elsewhere).

If no one has any objections (the proposal has been thoroughly discussed in a separate email thread
with myself, Blaise, Rick, David and Doug), I intend to check this in by EOB on Friday.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipselink-dev] Proposed changes to Dynamic Persistence
  - From: Blaise Doughan

Prev by Date: RE: [eclipselink-dev] regressions in the WDF test suite
Next by Date: [eclipselink-dev] BUILD STATUS:: trunk nightly build has test failures!
Previous by thread: [eclipselink-dev] regressions in the WDF test suite
Next by thread: Re: [eclipselink-dev] Proposed changes to Dynamic Persistence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs