Thanks for the improvement.
However, I still don't see any attempt to allow easy
customization via overriding, like mentioned here:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254287
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=244209
I'm not asking for anything fancy. Using Factory Method
pattern like mentioned in ["Design Pattern", 1994], would be a big
improvement.
-----Original Message-----
From: eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of christopher delahunt
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:15 PM
To: Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-dev] 2.1 Design doc for JMS-MDB cache coordination
New patch uploaded forĀ
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=214534
that incorporates all the feedback received.
Please review and provide any additional feedback.
thanks in advance,
Chris
christopher delahunt wrote:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=214534
> Patch uploaded for review and feedback
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Chris
>
> christopher delahunt wrote:
>> Design documentation can be found here:
>>
>>
http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/2.1/JMSCacheCoordinationUsingMDB
>>
<http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Development/JPA_2.0/undelimited_identifiers>
>>
>>
>> Please provide feedback either by replying to
this email or using the
>> Wiki discussion page.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipselink-dev mailing list
>> eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-dev mailing list
> eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-dev mailing list
eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev