Re: [eclipselink-dev] Why need to change build path of eclipselink.sdo.t

[Tom Ware <tom.ware@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Sebastien,

  Are you getting javax.activation from our SVN repository or from Orbit?

  We are in the middle of a transition to use Orbit to get all the dependencies 
we share with other Eclipse projects.  There is some info here:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Building

  The projects are set up to work with the projects from Orbit.

  We have seen some issues where Eclipse itself does not pick up name changes 
like the one above in some versions on refresh.

-Tom

Sebastien Tardif wrote:
> I'm learning slowly how to compile and run tests of EclipseLink.
>
> I have recent code and by default, project eclipselink.sdo.test is
> complaining that the build path is not right, not finding
> [javax.activation], so I had to change the "Projects" in "Java Build
> Path" from [javax.activation] to [javax.activation 1.1.0] to get it to
> work. 
>
> Is it really the step needed? That doesn't sound right.
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-dev mailing list
> eclipselink-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-dev