[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependencies
- From: "Peter Krogh" <peter.krogh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:37:41 -0400
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AcfKK4CwbpinMKohQniw1nI3I3CYLQ==
Yes. I would think so.
My question is are we using Junit4? Does Orbit have it?
[mailto:eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tom Ware
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:31 PM
To: michael.norman@xxxxxxxxxx; Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence
Subject: Re: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependencies
Are we allowed to append this to the initial contribution bug?
Mike Norman wrote:
> Doug Clarke wrote:
>> I would consider this code to be part of the EclipseLink testing
>> source that should have been contributed in our initial contribution.
>> How much code is it?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> *From:* eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:eclipselink-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]*On Behalf Of *Mike
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:20 AM
>> *To:* Dev mailing list for Eclipse Persistence Services
>> *Subject:* Re: [eclipselink-dev] EclipseLink dependancies
>> Tom Ware wrote:
>>>Are we filling requests for the testing-only jars?assume we do not need to do this for JUnit.
>> I have a custom extension to JUnit4 (junit4-ext-pb4.jar - .java
>> and .class files); do we
>> need to do any IP work for it?
> Only the core tests (and its underlying framework) was added. DBWS
> uses JUnit4 with an extension to manage ADE .properties
> files (titl.properties, env.properties - actually, it works outside of
> ADE and the .properties files could be call anything.properties)
> 15 Java source files, 1 antlib.xml file => compiles to 22 .class files
> Oracle Email Signature Logo
> Mike Norman | Principal Software Designer | 613.288.4638
> Oracle Server Technologies | TopLink Product
> 45 O'Connor Street, Suite 400 | Ottawa, ON K1P 1A4 | (fax) 613.238.2818
>eclipselink-dev mailing list
eclipselink-dev mailing list