|
All contributions that I've received for Neon.1 updates to the
New and Noteworthy have been merged.
I'll gather up some more information regarding the Type A/B
question for our next meeting.
Sorry I missed the call yesterday; I had a last minute conflict.
Wayne
On 05/10/16 04:23 PM, David Williams
wrote:
I have included my notes in the agenda from today, at
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/October_05_2016
PC Members, please fix anything I omitted or got wrong.
Additionally, for those not at the meeting:
Wayne, can you comment if the "New and Noteworthy" for Neon.1 is
done?
Doug, can you comment if you are still willing to lead an effort
to decide and describe exactly what it means to require the
ability to "update" across yearly releases? (You volunteered last
June ... maybe you could report on how that is going? :)
All, please read the important sections about requiring "Type B"
IP process (status quo assumed, for now) and Dani's role as "Java
9 coordinator" for a quick July update specifically for Java 9
support. (That is, while Dani is "coordinator", I am sure he would
appreciate input as to what "Java 9 support" should mean for the
Sim. Release repo and EPP packages.)
Thanks all,
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes
internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed
from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request
removal.
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
|
