I have included my notes in the agenda from today, at
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/October_05_2016PC Members, please fix anything I omitted or got wrong.
Additionally, for those not at the meeting:
Wayne, can you comment if the "New and Noteworthy" for Neon.1 is done?
Doug, can you comment if you are still willing to lead an effort to decide and describe exactly what it means to require the ability to "update" across yearly releases? (You volunteered last June ... maybe you could report on how that is going? :)
All, please read the important sections about requiring "Type B" IP process (status quo assumed, for now) and Dani's role as "Java 9 coordinator" for a quick July update specifically for Java 9 support. (That is, while Dani is "coordinator", I am sure he would appreciate input as to what "Java 9 support" should mean for the Sim. Release repo and EPP packages.)
Thanks all,
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.