Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Planning the release dates for Oxygen.0 and Neon.X update releases

> Ah, that makes sense. On the other hand, I think most of this movement was implicit in the decision to go to 4 releases a year, right?

Yes, at least for the planning council and those involved. I think we need to start to communicate this more aggressively. I'm not sure everyone is aware of this yet.

Dani



From:        Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM@IBMCH, Eclipse Planning Council private list <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        05.07.2016 15:51
Subject:        Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Planning the release dates for Oxygen.0 and Neon.X update releases
Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




On 2016-07-05 09:37 AM, Daniel Megert wrote:
>  I am not sure I understand the comment that the release would need to be "much later"?

Compared to what people/companies were used to with our SR2 dates.


Ah, that makes sense. On the other hand, I think most of this movement was implicit in the decision to go to 4 releases a year, right?


Just to be clear, I'm also in favor of having Java 9 in Neon.3 :-)

Excellent :)  Let's just hope that Java 9 sticks to its current schedule.

--
Mike Milinkovich

mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



Back to the top