Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Finalizing the list of Kepler+1 Names

+1 for Luna...
Adrian.

-----Original Message-----
From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mik Kersten
Sent: 25 January 2013 20:36
To: eclipse.org-planning-council
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Finalizing the list of Kepler+1 Names

Mike, lucky for you it sounds like what's old is new again so you don't have to feel as old.  Seems like there's enough agreement to strike that name from the list.

+1 for Luna

Mik

--
Dr. @mik_kersten, CEO, http://tasktop.com
Assistant: maria.ruizisaac@xxxxxxxxxxx, +1-778-588-6896

On 2013-01-25, at 11:31 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't think I could live with Lovelace and think it'd lead to lots of jokes, no matter how much we said "for Ada".  We'll have to find another way to honor Ada. 
> 
> I was going to suggest adding a "non-L" word to the list just to suggest it doesn't have to be strictly the next letter in the alphabet. Such as Mercury? I see there is software already called Mercury, but that seems to be the case for Luna also (and doubt either, by itself, could be Trademarked, since they are "common names").  But, don't mean to rock the boat, either, if people are happy with the L-list. (I could add Mercury to the bugzilla, if anyone agreed good to have a bit more range). 
> 
> Thanks all,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx> 
> To:        mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx, "eclipse.org-planning-council" <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> Date:        01/25/2013 01:46 PM 
> Subject:        Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Finalizing the list of Kepler+1        Names 
> Sent by:        eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
> 
> I tend to think of Ada Lovelace first :) 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace
> 
> List so far is: 
> Laila
> Laplace
> Lok
> Lorentz
> Lovelace
> Luna
> 
> Anyone else have suggestions / thoughts? 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Perhaps it's my age, but when I hear Lovelace, I think of Linda Lovelace[1]. Although I understand the intent, it's not a great name IMHO. If I'm the only one, you can safely ignore the old guy.
>   
> Like Doug, I was secretly rooting for Luna.
> 
>   
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Lovelace
> 
>   
> Mike Milinkovich
> 
> mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> +1.613.220.3223
> 
>   
> From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Doug Schaefer
> Sent: January-25-13 1:27 PM
> To: eclipse.org-planning-council
> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Finalizing the list of 
> Kepler+1 Names
> 
>   
> I was in favour of Luna. Mind you if we all add in our fav's you'd 
> probably end up with the original list...
> 
>   
> From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" 
> <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, 25 January, 2013 1:08 PM
> To: "eclipse.org-planning-council" 
> <eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Finalizing the list of 
> Kepler+1 Names
> 
>   
> Hey esteemed planning council members, here's the final list of names after all the votes came in:
> 
>   
> Ladon
> 
> Lagrange
> 
> Laika
> 
> Laila
> 
> Lambert
> 
> Laplace
> 
> Leibniz
> 
> Lenat
> 
> Leornado
> 
> Lepus
> 
> Leto
> 
> Leviathan
> 
> Liber
> 
> Lok
> 
> Lorentz
> 
> Lovelace
> 
> Luna
> 
> Luxor
> 
> Luyten
> 
> Lynx
> 
> Lyra
> 
>   
> Note: I removed some that I thought were silly and/or would never be 
> approved by Legal. Also favored page rank potential :)
> 
>   
> I would like to come up with five or so to offer for voting. Here are my five:
> 
> Laila
> 
> Laplace
> 
> Lok
> 
> Lorentz
> 
> Lovelace
> 
>   
> Do you have any favorites to add or don't like my suggestions? I'd like to finalize the list so we can post the poll on Sunday/Monday.
> 
>   
> Let me know!
> 
>   
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris Aniszczyk
> http://aniszczyk.org
> +1 512 961 6719
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list 
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
> 
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris Aniszczyk
> http://aniszczyk.org
> +1 512 961 6719 _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list 
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
> 
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal. 
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list 
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
> 
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
> 

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.


Back to the top