[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] TPTP and the Galileo Train requirements.
|
Thanks for the feedback (and the reminder to use TPTP for performance
testing with support). I've added these to our next call agenda:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Planning_Council/Dec_03_2008
My personal thoughts:
* N&N by RC - seems fine, but there's no time like when a feature's complete
to take a quick screen capture (if applicable) and write up a few words on
the wiki
* A single point and separate capability definition is perfect.
* Not sure on the last one, so hopefully we can come to some conclusion on
the next call.
Thanks,
Rich
On 11/19/08 6:32 PM, "Oliver E Cole" <oec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There has been much discussion regarding the Must and Should do's
> for Galileo. At today's TPTP PMC call, we went over each of the Must
> and Shoulds with regard to TPTP and also with regard to the others on
> the train.
>
> We weighed the effort for each against the expected benefits for
> each. Overall, we thought the list was fine. We have the following
> comments:
>
> New and Noteworthy - the bugzilla
> (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252805) says that these
> are done on each milestone. The Requirements page
> (http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo_Simultaneous_Release#Requirements_For_Partici
> pation)
> says RC (Release Candidate). TPTP agrees with this for the Release
> Candidate but it seems a bit much to have it as a must do for each and
> every milestone.
>
> Capabilities - TPTP will provide a single point of capability 'TPTP'
> in a plugin that will enable user to disable/enable TPTP UI
> contributions (import/export, launch configurations, views, preferences,
> and perspective). 254151 is already opened by Anne for such
> requirement. Does this single point comply with the must do?
>
> Also, we have a question regarding dependencies as TPTP has features
> that depend on other projects (e.g., Profile on server has a dependency
> on WTP). Do we leave the choice to the user or do we act smart and
> enable all the optional dependencies for the user?
>
> Performance - Please add that TPTP is appropriate for profiling and
> performance work. As you know, we are putting resources into the
> community profiler and this is exactly the kind of thing that we are
> trying to encourage. We will do good support.
>
> --oec
