Ganymedians,
I admit that I agree with Nick: if, um, NAB didn't notice that they
weren't part of the Ganymede update site January-June, they didn't
really participate in Ganymede, did they?
I'm happy to run Ganymatic so that they can test their sc file, but I
don't see re-releasing Ganymede to include them.
That's just my opinion,
Bjorn
Nick Boldt wrote:
I'm all for inclusion & forgiving mistakes, but isn't
one of the requirements for participation that you, um, test the
Ganymede site to ensure your bits can be installed from there? Surely
if this project had been testing the Ganymede staging site this would
have been caught & fixed months ago.