Hi guys,
if we have the problem of getting good talks in, then I would agree to limit the number of talks we accept per person/company, while dropping good talks in order to include bad ones IMHO sounds a bit strange.
In general I more agree to limiting the number of talks we accept per individual person (because I think we should try to reach a diversity of speakers) than to limiting the number of the talks we accept per company (and I do not say this because I am unaffacted in the first and affected in the latter case). In case the contributions related to a company are provided by different people and are dealing with different topics (which is mostly the case with itemis, where people from EMF, RMF, GEF, Sphinx, and Xtext/Xtend are involved), people should probably not be discriminated because they work for the same employer. However, if this is to be done to indicate that we strongly encourage diversity, I can live with that. As I am personally affected I will however not vote for any itemis talks to drop and will thus leave this to you guys. Concerning the Obeo talk and Christian's proposal (Why is OSGi dynamic), I would agree to the selections.
Concerning the "Desktop apps...", "Jnario...", and "Now that I've Got a Model..." extended talks, I would opt for leaving them all extended. I am personally convinced that a good program manifests itself in quality, not quantity. As such, I would rather spend additional time for "quality" talks than trying to include as much talks as we can.
Cheers Alexander
Am 17.08.2012 um 11:43 schrieb Martin Lippert: Hey! *Reduction options so far:*
We have recovered a standard talk slot which was simply incorrect data
in the table thanks to Martin....
*Martin*mention to reduce *“Desktop apps*....” “*Jnario*....” “*Now that
I’ve Got a Model*...” from extended to standard and reject one talk from
itemis and one from Sebastian.
*Christian*(myself) offered to give away “*Why is OSGi dynamic* ?” “
+1 *Cedric*offered to give away “*Chocolate Based Development*”
+1 I am also thinking about joining my talk: http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/sessions/embracing-eclipse-orionwith this one: http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/sessions/orion-integrations I think it would make sense from the content side. I will reach out to Szymon and ask him if that would be possible. Cheers, -Martin _______________________________________________ eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
-- Dr. Alexander Nyßen Dipl.-Inform. Software-Engineer
Telefon: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-210 Telefax: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-211 Mobil: +49 (0) 151 / 17396743
http://www.itemis.de alexander.nyssen@xxxxxxxxx
itemis AG Am Brambusch 15-24 44536 Lünen
Rechtlicher Hinweis:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621
Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens Trompeter, Sebastian Neus
Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael Neuhaus
|