[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Converting talk types?
|
Glad you asked. The answer is no. :)
Ok, I'm being extreme here. Your first thought should be to convince
those long talk submissions to use a short talk format. Please pursue
this first before dismissing the short talks out right. You get better
exposure to your category by having more talks. If that turns out to be
impossible, then we'll need to discuss as a group.
I've asked Bjorn if we can free up any more space at the conference for
long talks. He's going to recalculate the numbers, but don't hold your
breath.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of jograham@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 1:55 PM
> To: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Converting talk
> types?
>
>
> Sorry if this has been discussed and decided before: couldn't find it
> in my
> notes...
>
> At what point do we consider requests to covert/trade talk types? The
> Data
> Tooling track has four short talks open, but one more long talk than
> our
> current allocation. Is there some way that I might be able to trade
> these
> short talks for an additional long talk slot?
>
> Regards,
> John Graham
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
> Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
> http://dataplat.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-
> program-committee
