[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Download stats reliability and SLA
|
This is not something the AC owns. It's entirely owned by the Webmaster team - defining SLA and collecting data.
-Gunnar
--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/
> On Mar 16, 2020, at 18:53, Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Architecture Council,
>
> I'm curious about how reliable are the download stats and what's the SLA we should expect from it in term of support to project trying to leverage them.
> There were some discussions on another ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing-list where the download stats were challenged by some people who think they're more or less not worth checking/trusting. Also I've opened a bug some time ago about download stats that seem fishy https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=560520 (note that it can totally be an issue on my end, but I fail at finding what it is), and didn't receive any support so far. It's a bit disappointing, but am I right to be disappointed or are download stats a service that's ultimately not really supported by EMO and I just have too high expectations?
> In any case, can we have the related "SLA" and reliability made explicit and ideally referenced on the download stats page?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse IDE developer, for Red Hat Developers
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
