Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Real names in git commit messages

On 11.03.20, 20:18, "eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gunnar Wagenknecht" <eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    > On Mar 11, 2020, at 19:54, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > 
    > Signed-off-by: Marcono1234 <Marcono1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > 
    > Where Marcono1234 has signed ECA but doesn't want email address and real name published in open fashion.
    
    
    This raises an interesting question. If Marcono1234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx registers for an Eclipse account with that email and a random name he/she should be able to sign the ECA and the bot approves. That's why we still need committers to check. As a committer, I still think that I do not want anonymous contributors in my projects. That's not a trustworthy base of communication and collaboration in my opinion. I think this will also raises a lot eyebrows for a large adopter/consumer base.
    
    I still think requiring a legal name is a good thing. I'll put the topic on the call agenda for tomorrow. :) 
    
    -Gunnar
    
+1, I see this like Gunnar, and don't want anonymous contributors.
If a contributor doesn't trust the project enough to disclose his name why should the project trust the anonymous contributor ?

-Matthias


Back to the top