Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 15:22:17 +0200
Delivered-to: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/eclipse.org-architecture-council>
List-help: <mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council>, <mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/eclipse.org-architecture-council>, <mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From what I know with NPM you can file a single CQ with a whole bunch of modules in it.

That's good to know. Too bad that there is nowhere in the PMI or IPZilla where this is made explicit and encouraged so people can be aware of this possibility before starting more tedious way of doing it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
  - From: Denis Roy

References:
- [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
  - From: Billings, Jay Jay
- Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
  - From: Doug Schaefer
- Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
  - From: Mickael Istria
- Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
  - From: Jens Reimann

Prev by Date: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
Next by Date: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
Previous by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
Next by thread: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] IPZilla rant
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs