Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 9-Mar Meeting Notes

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've created the Bugzilla records and have added references in the minutes.

For reference, the board resolution (June 2015) that I mentioned during the call [1] states:

RESOLVED, that previously approved dependencies of Eclipse projects can be
reviewed and approved by the EMO as follows:
a) Service releases (e.g. x.y.*, bug fixes, security fixes) will require no review.
b) Minor revisions (e.g. x.*.*) will require a reduced review by the EMO.
c) Major revisions (e.g. *.*.*) will require a full review by the EMO.

Wayne

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/org/foundation/boardminutes/2015_06_22_Minutes.pdf

On 09/03/17 12:07 PM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:

Hi all,

 

Notes of today’s meeting are now online:

https://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/March_9_2017

 

I heard some beeps from people joining late, so please update the attendee list if you are missing.

Wayne wanted to fill in some Bugzilla references.

Expect more new member nominations upcoming, and a quick note about F2F at Devoxx US/EclipseConverge.

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation