Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 10-Nov Meeting Notes

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think the main reason these things are coming up is that we have no
organization that represents the Eclipse IDE where these things can be
organized. The ide-dev list seems to be the only thing, but that¹s not
very formal.

Also, a lot of us old timers joined the Architecture Council because we
are technical experts with a strong interest in Architecture. That never
has seemed to be the mandate of the council, and really, the council
doesn¹t have much power to affect anything architecturally other than to
get together and have a place to talk about these issues.

As Eclipse has diversified beyond the IDE, it would be impossible to find
architectural issues that are of interest to everyone. The only thing
common is what Wayne is suggesting with project mentorship.

In the end, we need to find a home for the IDE topics and maybe the
Architecture Council is not the appropriate home. As Mickael suggested,
we¹re self organizing these things anyway. It makes it hard to pin down
what exactly is going on, but we¹ll keep trying.

Doug.

On 2016-11-11, 8:29 AM,
"eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Julien
Vermillard" <eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on
behalf of jvermillard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Sorry but neither Eclipse IDE market place, nor FEEP or LSP is a topic
>for Eclipse IoT.
>I'm looking forward subcomitees for helping to make AC meetings more
>cross projects.
>
>Anyway we plan to nominate more representative from IoT since we would
>like more mentoring force.
>
>Julien
>(resending because, apparently, the mail server ignore my messages
>because I was
>subscribed with an alias an not my real mail address)
>
>On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:55:13AM -0800, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Notes of today¹s meeting are now online:
>> 
>> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/November_10_2016
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> We anticipate the creation of a ³language server subcommittee²,
>> 
>> Wayne¹s going to send out a proposal on subcommittees in general
>> 
>> In order to better deal with the ever increasing size of the AC.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> There was no attendance from the BIRT, DTP, Mylyn, SOA, WTP and IoT
>>PMCs ­
>> 
>> Maybe those PMCs consider nominating an alternate representative ?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner ­ Development Tools, Wind River
>> 
>> direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
>> 
>>  
>> 
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
>> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>> 
>> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal
>>to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
>>you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
>
>-- 
>Julien Vermillard
>Mobile: +33680328665
>jvermillard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx :: https://www.sierrawireless.com
>_______________________________________________
>eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
>eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>
>IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
>the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you
>must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.