Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] 11-Aug AC meeting notes

I'm pretty sure that there are no IP-related issues for Docker build scripts. Since you're not actually distributing the artifacts, I believe that the existing system (which includes an implied exempt pre-req on the OS) still works. You just can't distribute the built artifacts from an Eclipse Foundation-managed property.

We're just starting with DockerHub as a distribution channel, so we haven't quite worked out the issues. This is where I can use your help.

I've secured the "eclipse", "locationtech", and "polarsys" organizations on DockerHub. I've connected with a few projects to work with to sort out the issues and questions that need to be answered.

If you want to participate in this with GeoServer, let me know.


Wayne


On 11/08/16 12:45 PM, Jim Hughes wrote:
Hi all,

I'm in the same boat; sorry to miss the meeting.

On the topic of Eclipse build infrastructure, I'd note that the webmaster team has been fairly responsive to requests regarding LocationTech HIPP / Nexus concerns.  Overall, that is working ok.  Currently, GeoMesa is using the public Travis CI servers for GitHub commits and PRs.  Those builds are slow; having dedicated Eclipse hardware would be awesome. 

As a big stretch, having a cloud which would be used for integration tests would be nice, but that's likely too big an ask.

For Docker builds, would all the software included have to pass the Eclipse IP guidelines?  It seems like some of the pieces of a standard Linux distribution in a Docker might be GPL.  If we can have that in a Docker image, I'd like to ship a Docker with GeoServer in it...

Cheers,

Jim

On 08/11/2016 12:39 PM, Martin Lippert wrote:
Hey!

Same here, sorry for missing the call.

Cheers,
Martin



Am 11.08.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>:

Everyone,

I apologize that I missed the meeting. My schedule got jumbled up. I will review the notes.

Jay


On Aug 11, 2016 12:00 PM, "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Notes of the meeting we just had are now online:

https://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/August_11_2016

 

Interesting chat with some opportunities to follow-up via Bugzilla.

Talk you again on Sep 8,

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 


_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.


_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.



_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation

Back to the top