| Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Next Meeting? |
On 28 Mar 2016, at 22:05, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 03/29/2016 12:11 AM, Jay Jay Billings wrote:
Mickael,
For my part, I agree with all of what you wrote. However, what I see as important are the speed and minimalism of Vi and Sublime. Everyone I know who uses those tools over Eclipse cite those reasons. I don't think it is beyond reason to address those issues.
Are speed and minimalism really criteria on which Eclipse IDE can compete with Vim and Eclipse? IMO, it's just not a battle Eclipse IDE can win, by design.
It can. once eclipse is running eclipse is just as fast.
we have to stop this thinking that Eclipse is slow. it is not.
If it is its a bug!Unless you start installing plugins that thinks its okey to do a ton
of background work even though the user have not asked for it./max
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat http://www.jboss.org/tools
My blog http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com - My Tweets http://twitter.com/mickaelistria
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-councilIMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.