Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Next Meeting?

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1!



From:      
 Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:      
 17.03.2016 18:47
Subject:    
   Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council]
Next Meeting?
Sent by:    
   eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On 3/17/2016 3:25 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 03/15/2016 05:54 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 03/15/2016 05:35 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Again, we have an opportunity with the press attention
on Che to steal some of that attention for the desktop IDE. What are we
going to do about it?
Maybe we could think of an Eclipse Che vs Eclipse IDE
FAQ with several questions:
I didn't see any answer on this topic.
@Wayne: is this something the Foundation could consider as an announcement/advertised
article?

My suggestion would be to have a full Eclipse newsletter dedicated to the
great things happening in the desktop IDE, perhaps including a discussion
of how the Eclipse Foundation is committing resources to help enhance the
platform via FEEP. Maybe it's just me, but I don't see how a Coke versus
Pepsi FAQ is all that helpful. I would be concerned that it would come
across as defensive. A strong, consistent, and positive message is the
best way to remind everyone about the continued health of the desktop IDE.

-- 
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
@mmilinkov

Scanned for viruses. www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.