Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Fwd: [ec] 16 February 2016 EC bal

[Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe not. I don't know the people involved. My first instinct though is to always ask if there is room for more people and how we can help. I find that intransigence is often dissolved by those two little questions.

We could always reach out to them and see what they think about this works relationship to Eclipse.

Jay

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2/18/2016 10:20 AM, Jay Jay Billings wrote:

I wouldn't look at this as being competitive with e4 at this point. I would see it as an opportunity to make e4 or part of it the reference implementation for JSR 377.

Although that is a possibility, I do not believe that is the intent of the people involved.

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)

This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

--

Jay Jay Billings

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings