Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 12-Nov Meeting Notes

One more for item for consideration. This is similar to the Linux item already on the list.

 

[FEEP] Fix issues in Mac SWT port

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=482409

 

Thanks,

 

- Konstantin

 


From: Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 8:29 PM
To: Marcel Bruch;eclipse.org-architecture-council eclipse.org
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 12-Nov Meeting Notes

 

 

I added another line item for consideration. If you’ve voted already, please vote on this item as well.

 

[FEEP] JVM selection UI in the launcher

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=482236

 

Thanks,

 

- Konstantin

 

 


From: Marcel Bruch
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 3:21 AM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council eclipse.org
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 12-Nov Meeting Notes

 

 

The google doc for the first round of votes is available at [1].

 

Some general thoughts about votings:

 

Votes should be in between -2 and +2

 

Some guidance on what I consider a ±2,±1:

 

+2 means strong preference - I’d champion this FEEP as much as I can. It’s well scoped and suitable as FEEP project

+1 means weak preference - I’d can imagine this FEEP will improve the state and may be important to many.

±0 mean no preference - I can’t estimate the benefits of this feature or am yet undecided

-1 means weak reject - I think this feature is not very useful or should be started with FEEP at the moment

-2 means strong reject - this feature does not make sense - at least not to be developed as part of FEEP

 

Feel free to put short comments into your voting cells. The can serve as inputs for later discussion.

 

If you have additional proposals, please raise a FEEP bug against Architecture Council and add a line at the bottom of the table.

 

I kindly ask you to vote until Wednesday afternoon. I plan summarize the results on Thursday morning.

 

 

 

Thank you

Marcel

 

 

[1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mxRX9CCveSgD1abemlBCOAW1zQfyi22HIq7awVfkc_s/edit?usp=sharing

 

 

 

 

 

Am 12.11.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Oberhuber, Martin <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

 

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS

 

 


Back to the top