Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 8-Nove Meeting Notes

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No, that’s perfect – you’ll only have to agree inside the RT PMC who’s the delegates.

The AC welcomes all of you J

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 

From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Bull
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 7:13 AM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC 8-Nove Meeting Notes

 

I've added myself as a backup for RT on the AC (I'm on the RT PMC). Is this ok, or is there a process that I should have followed?

 

cheers,

Ian

 

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Oberhuber, Martin <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,

 

Notes of the meeting we just had are now online:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/November_8_2012

 

Thanks to all who sent regrets, this is your chance to read up J

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

 

--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource