[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] To SVN or not to SVN: is that the question?
|
+1, and as a lead for one still using svn (TCF), I plan on moving it to git in the next week or so.
Doug.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Wayne Beaton
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:18 PM
> To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] To SVN or not to SVN: is that the
> question?
>
> Is it time to start thinking about deprecating SVN?
>
> We almost never create new projects that use SVN; I'm thinking that it's time
> to remove it as an option in the New Project Provisioning Request form. i.e.
> all new project will be compelled to use Git.
>
> Note that this is a different discussion from that of asking existing SVN-based
> projects to move. But, I guess, that conversation can't be too far behind.
>
> Thoughts? Concerns? Issues?
>
> Wayne
>
> --
> Wayne Beaton
> The Eclipse Foundation
> Twitter: @waynebeaton
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list eclipse.org-architecture-
> council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
> the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must
> contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
