Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] PMC Approval Lag?

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, holiday's over, time to get serious
again. :) 

Doug's talked to the Tools PMC about
this (potential) move for months, so no surprises there ... and you'd be
welcome, if there's any doubt. 

If it helps you to give some concrete
links, the process is spelled out in 

http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Move_Reviews

A recent case I'm familiar with (not
to Tools) might provide some example you could follow (I'm sure there's
others): 

Docuware: 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=302899

Infrastructure: 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=306095


Thanks,

From:	Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"eclipse.org-architecture-council" <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	04/01/2010 02:48 PM
Subject:	Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] PMC Approval Lag?
Sent by:	eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

>   2)  That the Technology PMC take
steps to help mature Technology
>        contained projects to move out from under
the Technology umbrella.

As lead of the Linux Tools project which is under the Technology
umbrella, I'm willing to put our project forward as a candidate to move
to Tools.  Perhaps seeing movement of some projects will inspire others
to do so as well.

Andrew
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.