[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] RE: JSRs
|
It looks like we're good to go. I'll post to this list next time there's
a vote.
Wayne
John Arthorne wrote:
If public discussion isn't allowed, another option would be to just
discuss it verbally during architecture council calls. Of course the
EMO will have the final say, but we could use that channel to provide
project input to the process.
John
eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on
05/28/2009 09:32:35 AM:
> Hi folks. I am going to take a look through the JCP documentation to
> make sure that we're allowed to discuss the vote in a public forum.
> Assuming that it's not a violation of the JCP rules, I will post notice
> of the votes as they come up to solicit discussion and recommendation
> from the Architecture Council members.
>
> Ultimately, while input from the Architecture Council will be valuable
> in the decision making process, there are many factors that Mike and I
> consider when casting a vote on behalf of Eclipse.
>
> More later.
>
> Wayne
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
