Iâm happy to take a hot seat and attempt to disagree with Jeff and Chris, in case they start agreeing too much to make the panel interesting.
From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] AC panel at EclipseCon
+1, I echo the same sentiment
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Ed Merks <ed.merks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 I volunteer, if there are not enough other volunteers.
Jeff McAffer wrote:
+1 (and I'll volunteer for a hot seat)
Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
I have entered this panel into the EclipseCon submission system:
527 Challenge Eclipse - Ask the AC (Panel) https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2009/view_talk.php?id=527
We will need 5 - 10 AC members volunteering to sit on the "hot chairs"
for answering questions, and 1 moderator for asking questions as
incentive. I have started a Wiki page for signing up and collecting
While that page will only be relevant once the panel gets accepted by
the EclipseCon moderators, we can start collecting ideas now. And, it is
relevant NOW to improve the title and abstract such that it gets
Please propose title / abstract changes, and ideas for additional
questions here on the mailing list since that is best for discussion.
And BTW, Bjorn agreed that Sunday afternoon would be best for our
"internal" AC meeting since there's just too much going on during the
rest of EclipseCon... I've started a Wiki page to collect attendance as
well as agenda ideas. Let's focus on things that are best discussed
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.