RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders

[Darin Wright <Darin_Wright@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 for Thursdays. I have a standing meeting on the Tuesday timeslot - 
alternating is also OK.

Darin Wright




"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
08/25/2008 11:07 AM
Please respond to
"eclipse.org-architecture-council" 
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"eclipse.org-architecture-council" 
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders






Good to have some discussion!
 
One point about alternating is that it's not only about remembering when
the next call is. It's also about scheduling other calls, and seems to 
create some ripple effect:
 
If it's important for me to regularly join alternating AC meetings, then I 

cannot organize standing meetings on either Tuesday or Thursday. 
Unless I'm OK with not joining a standing meeting every 2 months.
 
But we have the voting system for finding the best possible
compromise. If you can't ever attend a meeting on Tuesday,
you can vote it -1. That is, you have a +1/-1 vote for each of
the alternatives, giving 3 votes in total which you can exercise 
or not.
 
Assuming Neil's -1 for Tuesday and Oliver's -1 for Thursday
(who said they definitely can't join these days), we currently get:
 
+2 Thursday (Andrew, Jeff, Martin - Oliver)
+3 Alternating (Jeff, Neil, Boris)
+3 Tuesday (Jeff, Oliver, Chris, Martin - Neil)
 
I'm not in favor of re-voting (in the interest of getting a decision
soon), but feel free to change a vote or add one which you 
have not exercised yet.
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Boris Bokowski
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:32 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] EAC Reminders

+1 for alternating. With all the Google calendars we have in place now for 
Eclipse related events, it should be possible to use a more complicated 
call schedule.

Boris

Neil Hauge wrote:
> +1 for Alternating.
> 
> If we don't alternate, then some will be forever unable to attend on a 
> set day.  I would not be able to attend Tuesday at 11am due to a 
> standing PMC meeting.  Alternating seems to be the most inclusive 
option.
> 
> I think if alternating is not the winner, we should have a re-vote for 
> Tuesday or Thursday to get a clear count. : )  In any case, my secondary 

> vote would be +1 for Keep Thursday.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to 
the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you 
must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.