Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Architecture Council contribution

[Harm Sluiman <sluiman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ok, so I am appropriately humbled ;-),
but have not had time to read the minutes/mail on the subject.
Is this an acceptable diagram http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/groups/Architecture/documents/arch_main.html
or do I have to figure out how to put runtime and tool time in the same
block?
Thanks for your time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harm Sluiman, STSM,  
phone:905-413-4032   fax: 4920  
cell: 1-647-300-4758
mailto:sluiman@xxxxxxxxxx
Admin : Arlene Treanor atreanor@xxxxxxxxxx  Tie: 969-2323 1-905-413-2323

Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

02/22/2006 10:18 PM

Please respond to
"eclipse.org-architecture-council"

To	"eclipse.org-architecture-council" <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[eclipse.org-architecture-council] Architecture Council contribution to the Roadmap (potentially embarrassing;  you'll want to read this today; not tomorrow - today)

Well, in spite of the action item from our last call (an
action item that everyone agreed to) for the architecture diagrams to be
completed by the 16th, and in spite of today being the 22nd (that's 6 days
after the absolutely last deadline), only Richard Gronback sent in his
diagram.

Unfortunately, in spite of all of you (except Richard) not putting in the
1/2 hour necessary to produce your architecture diagrams, the Roadmap still
needs to be completed. It's actually part of the Bylaws of the Eclipse
Foundation, so there is really no option.  Hence I wrote up an Architecture
Council Roadmap page. 

This is an embarrassing page. It mentions each person who agreed to submit
the material and did not, and it mentions them by name, and it mentions
them by name in 34 point font. That's Kevin, John, David, Harm, Wenfeng,
John, and Michael.

The Roadmap is a frozen document and thus, unless I receive a diagram from
you by Sunday midnight, this
is the way it's going to go out to the public,
and the way the Board is going to see it, and the way it will be stored
on the website for as long as Denis can keep the servers running.

SO IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE LISTED AS NOT PROVIDING A DIAGRAM, this is
it. Technically, last Monday was the deadline for shipping this to the
membership for the one month pre-review. We're giving it another few days
but then the Bylaws say it has to go out. No ifs and ors or buts.

Here's what it looks like. Scroll down to find your project's section:
http://www.eclipse.org/org/councils/roadmap_v2_0/AC_v2_0/main.html

P.S. I cannot draw these diagrams for you. I don't know your architectures.
You'll have to do it or be listed in black and white._______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council