Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] November 7thConference call agenda

My (belated) regrets as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of jograham@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:38 AM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Cc: eclipse.org-architecture-council;
eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] November 7thConference
call agenda

Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend today's meeting.

Regards,
John Graham
Staff Software Engineer
Sybase, Inc.
telephone: (978) 287-1634  (GMT - 5)
e-mail: john.graham@xxxxxxxxxx



 

             Harm Sluiman

             <sluiman@xxxxxx.c

             om>
To 
             Sent by:
"eclipse.org-architecture-council"  
             eclipse.org-archi
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@e 
             tecture-council-b         clipse.org>

             ounces@xxxxxxxxxx
cc 
             g

 
Subject 
                                       Re:

             11/08/2005 07:48
[eclipse.org-architecture-council]  
             AM                        November 7th Conference
call  
                                       agenda

 

             Please respond to

             "eclipse.org-arch

             itecture-council"

             <eclipse.org-arch

             itecture-council@

               eclipse.org>

 

 






I missed last months call (totally miss the window for the homework ;-))
and can't make it today, but I would like to make a few comments in the
spirit of trying to get some threads going in the mailing list.

I think the path of blockitecture that shows functional areas of a
project
and the inner and interdependencies on other blocks is the top level to
start with. Perhaps the blocks are like super features., and can be
drilled
into to see plug-in cross dependancies. This is where we started last
year,
and how we structured the TPTP pages, but we did not get consistency
across
projects. This can define technical structure.

I think Wenfeng's idea bring this structure to the human level, and
writing
some functional use cases that span projects is a good thing, although
hard
at times. I believe each project should commit to some viewlets/flash
walk
throughs of their project functional area. Most are doing this. On top
of
that there are some walk throughs that can span projects without show
all
the intricate details of each. I know that doing a TPTP centric demo
that
crosses WTP, JDT, TPTP and BIRT positioning goes over very well with
users
and developers alike. I am creating a viewlet that does this now, and
would
encourage other leads to try the same intentional effort, if for no
reason
but to force awareness of cross project collaboration potential.

In the past the only way I have seen successful cross big project
demo/architectures etc. is when a single person is given the job to
deliver
it. I am not sure we have such a person in this case so the best efforts
of
many seem to have to do ;-)

Thanks for your time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Harm Sluiman, STSM,
phone:905-413-4032   fax: 4920
cell: 1-647-300-4758
mailto:sluiman@xxxxxxxxxx
Admin : Arlene Treanor atreanor@xxxxxxxxxx  Tie: 969-2323 1-905-413-2323

 

 Bjorn Freeman-Benson

 <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx

 >
To 
 Sent by:
eclipse.org-architecture-co 
 eclipse.org-architecture-council-             uncil@xxxxxxxxxxx

 bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc 
 

 
Subject 
 11/08/2005 01:11 AM
[eclipse.org-architecture-c 
                                               ouncil] November 7th

                                               Conference call

         Please respond to                     agenda

  "eclipse.org-architecture-counci

                 l"

 

 

 

 

 






Monthly Architecture Council Conference Call
Second Tuesday of each month, 8am PST, 11am EST
   613.287.8000
or   866.362.7064
passcode 874551#
1.        Changing the call time/date in Q1? A number of people cannot
make
the second Tuesday of each month calls, so shall we try a different day
and/or time in Q1?
2.        Outline what we want to have in the Architecture Council
section
of the Roadmap. We need to collectively decide what we want to show for
our
time this year - what sort of documentation of the current architecture
are
we (which mostly means you all) willing to spend time writing for the
end
of the year? The answer might be (disappointingly) "very little", but
now
is the time to step up to the task or to state definitely that we won't
be
doing much.
      Last month we decided "We discussed what we should be creating for
      the architecture diagram for the Roadmap. Is it a summary of the
      current state? Is it a discussion of the future and forward
looking
      architecture? Is it useful to the existing projects or is it just
      seen as a waste of time providing no benefit to the teams? We
      concluded that we needed to have documentation of the existing
      architecture before we could do anything more forward looking so
we
      resolved (ok, ok, Bjorn browbeat everyone into agreeing) to spend
a
      half-hour writing up their current view of the Eclipse Platform
      architecture.  These emails might provoke discussion on our
mailing
      list, plus Bjorn is going to merge these all into a discussion
      document for our next call."
3.        Using our decision for (2) we will review our inputs from the
last meeting and decide what we can do next to produce the Roadmap. The
inputs from the last meeting were very varied:
      David Williams: documents and diagrams showing the dependencies
      between WTP subsystems
      Richard Gronback: list of subsystems across Eclipse
      John Graham: traditional boxes view of subsystems seen by DTP
      Bjorn Freeman-Benson: list of subsystems across Eclipse
      Kevin Haaland: list of sub-projects and plug-ins and key
components
      in the Platform
      Wenfeng Li: list of subsystems across Eclipse grouped by
scenarios:
      tools, designer, deployment
      Kai Nyman: agreed with Wenfeng about using use-case scenario-based
      architecture diagrams
      Tim Wagner: no input
      Michael Scharf: no input
4.        Finally, we will talk about agenda items for the Council
meetings.
      The Lattix folks have offered to come to the Council meetings and
      show us what they have been extracting of the Eclipse architecture
      using their tools.
      ???
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-counci
l
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-counci
l


_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-counci
l



Back to the top