Re: [eclipse-scripting-dev] eScriptMonkey naming

[Aaron Spear <aspear@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Scriptonite" ? :-)

Aaron Spear

----- Original Message -----
> I still like "Scriptic" although I'm slightly concerned that one could
> associate it with "Cryptic" which is exactly _not_ what we want to be .
> 
> What about something like "Bach" , "Fuga" , "Symphony" , "Sinfonia" ,
> "Scriptony"
> 
> Since we want the scripting to be able and automate all of Eclipse,
> "orchestrating" the various plugins into something that works together
> producing better workflows through automation ? Other names about famous
> authors or musicians would also work of course.
> 
> I think the project name is only relevant while Scripting is a separate
> component, to be discovered and installed separately. It should be easy to
> find, remember, and install. In case we should get into the Platform at some
> point via e4, the project name wouldn't really matter any more since then
> scripting is just "already there".
>  
> Thanks,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect - Development Tools, Wind River
> direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse-scripting-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse-scripting-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber,
> Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:43 AM
> To: Discussions about scripting Eclipse.
> Subject: Re: [eclipse-scripting-dev] eScriptMonkey naming
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I like "Scriptic" , although it doesn't have any connection to Eclipse or
> what we're trying to achieve specifically with this project.
> 
> What about "EasyScript" since one goal is appealing to end users and make
> scripting for them very easy (regardless of scripting language) ?
> I think the "ease of use" was one of the design goals behind Monkey, it
> strived to be as easy and widespread as Mozilla GreaseMonkey.
> 
> Shortening EasyScript, we're back to "EScript" which could be taken for
> "Eclipse Scripting" or "Easy Scripting".
> 
> Are there any must-have criteria why we absolutely can't take "EScript" ?
> Perhaps we can remove any blockers here by some other means ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect - Development Tools, Wind River
> direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse-scripting-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse-scripting-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DAUSSY
> Arthur
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:25 AM
> To: Discussions about scripting Eclipse.
> Subject: Re: [eclipse-scripting-dev] eScriptMonkey naming
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
>  I agree with you about the name. Something new would be better.
>  However I don't really like using acronyms for name. I find it hard to
>  remember. I would prefer something like Scriptic or ScriptOn (already
>  taken) that seems easier to remember.
>  I have thought about :
>         4Script (If we are host in E4)
>         Scriptic
>         Scripto
> 
> 
>  Regards,
> 
> 
> Arthur Daussy
> Atos
> arthur.daussy@xxxxxxxx
> +33 5 34 36 32 90
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : eclipse-scripting-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse-scripting-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de
> Christian.Pontesegger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Envoyé : mardi 10 septembre 2013 08:47
> À : eclipse-scripting-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [eclipse-scripting-dev] eScriptMonkey naming
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as the new eScriptMonkey project is growing on GitHub, I'd like to propose to
> find a nice new project name for it. While a eScriptMonkey is fine as a
> working title I would prefer a new name for following reasons:
> 
> * There already exists a project called scriptMonkey on github:
> https://github.com/siddii/scriptmonkey/
> 
> * The name very similar to EclipseMonkey. While a "monkey" would be great for
> icon design (which we will need in time) I think the name would let users
> think, that this project is a simple revival of EclipseMonkey. But it is far
> more than that. Actually the "monkey" part (loading scripts, having dynamic
> menus to organize them, the DOMs) is just one facet of the whole thing.
> Providing a simple module mechanism for users to contribute, shell
> scripting, ev. Visual scripts are things beyond the focus of EclipseMonkey
> (please correct me, if I'm wrong).
> 
> * eScriptMonkey (to me) seems very long as a root package name
> (org.eclipse.escriptmonkey...)
> 
> 
> I am not very happy with eScript either as it sounds more like a new
> scripting language than what it actually is: an interpreter framework.
> 
> So I started thinking and found some candidates:
> 
> DSEE: Dynamic Script Execution Environment (pronounce: [di: si:], like the
> 2nd part of AC/DC)
> EASE:  Eclipse Advanced Scripting Environment
> 
> 
> Let me know what you think: do we need a better project name? Any suggestions
> for a decent name?
> 
> Best regards
> Christian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse-scripting-dev mailing list
> eclipse-scripting-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-scripting-dev
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage
> exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret
> professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir
> immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne
> pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité du groupe Atos ne
> pourra être engagée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs
> efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout
> virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa
> responsabilité ne saurait être engagée pour tout dommage résultant d'un
> virus transmis.
> 
> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely
> for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity
> cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be
> triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain
> a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this
> transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting
> from any virus transmitted.
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse-scripting-dev mailing list
> eclipse-scripting-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-scripting-dev
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse-scripting-dev mailing list
> eclipse-scripting-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-scripting-dev
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse-scripting-dev mailing list
> eclipse-scripting-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-scripting-dev
>