Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material

Thanks Alex.

I've updated the review material accordingly and also renamed the remaining "GTK" occurrences with "GTK+".

Dani



From:        "Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        "eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        28.05.2014 07:48
Subject:        Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material
Sent by:        eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Sounds perfect to me, thanks!

Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6


-----Original Message-----
From: eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aleksandar Kurtakov
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:54 AM
To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material

Hi Martin,
Does the following sounds better?
Linux builds come with GTK+ 3 support enabled by default on GTK+ 3 versions prior to 3.10, versions newer than that will fallback to GTK+ 2.x by default for maximum stability.

Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Oberhuber" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:00:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material
>
> "on versions prior to 3.10"
> ^^^^^^
>
> I like the tone of your proposed wording, but I  think you'd have to
> clarify what versions you mean.
> I assume you mean "on GTK Versions prior to 3.10" ?
>
> It could also be mistaken as "Linux Kernel Versions prior to 3.10" or
> "Equinox versions prior to 3.10" or even something else...
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind River
> direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [
mailto:eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aleksandar
> Kurtakov
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:49 PM
> To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material
>
>  Linux builds come with GTK+ 3 support enabled by default on versions
> prior  to 3.10, versions newer than that will fallback to GTK+ 2.x by
> default for  maximum stability.
> ^^ Sounds better to me, wdyt?
>
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 8:41:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > can you provide a better wording for that item in the release review?
> >
> > Please also verify that the information on
> >
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.
> > ec
> > lipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_4.xml#tar
> > ge t_environments is correct.That's what Arun communicated to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dani
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: 27.05.2014 18:42
> > Subject: Re: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material Sent by:
> > eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * Linux builds come with GTK+ 3 support but only enabled by default
> > for Ubuntu LTS 14.04 - This is not the whole truth as every other
> > Linux distribution that has GTK 3.0 - 3.8 (Mint, Mageia, Suse,
> > Fedora....) will have it enabled too. Better to not send misleading
> > information.
> >
> > Rest looks good to me.
> >
> >
> > Alexander Kurtakov
> > Red Hat Eclipse team
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:37:09 PM
> > > Subject: [eclipse-pmc] Luna (4.4) Release Review Material
> > >
> > > Dear PMC members,
> > >
> > > please review the Luna (4.4) release review material which comes
> > > in a new format and look this year, and respond with feedback to
> > > this list. Please also respond whether you approve or decline the
> > > review (needed by the EMO) by the end of this week,
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dani
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eclipse-pmc mailing list
> > > eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eclipse-pmc mailing list
> > eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eclipse-pmc mailing list
> > eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
> >
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse-pmc mailing list
> eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse-pmc mailing list
> eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
>
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc


Back to the top