Re: [platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inc

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think there is a misunderstanding here. ECF made a contribution to p2 yesterday. I don't think anyone claimed the contribution ECF made yesterday contained no code changes in the ECF bundles used by p2.
Since the contribution yesterday the ECF team had to respin their build to include a fix in an ECF bundle which is not used by p2.

>The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform

This claim is only pertaining to the changes between the ECF contribution made yesterday and the one being made today. I think it is fair to ask why any of the code changes are required at this time. Hopefully Scott can give us the justification for these changes.

Tom



Pascal Rapicault ---06/04/2009 03:46:23 PM---I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 27th and have found 3 code changes in three plugins that *are* affec

From:	Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/04/2009 03:46 PM
Subject:	Re: [platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF

---

I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 27th and have found 3 code changes in three plugins that *are* affected by the platform
ContainerFactory in org.eclipse.ecf
Activator in org.eclipse.ecf.identity
AbstractRetrieveFileTransfer org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer

>The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform
Who do I trust? Now I'm worried.

Is there a bug report backing any of these changes? Why now?

PaScaL

Jeff McAffer ---06/04/2009 04:18:57 PM---+1

From:	Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:	"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/04/2009 04:18 PM
Subject:	[platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF

---

+1

The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform. The only reason we have to get a new contirbutuion is because the qualifiers changed. That issue will be addressed in ECF build in the future. This will be the last ECF contribution related to the platform's use.

Jeff

Pascal Rapicault wrote:

----- Forwarded by Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/IBM on 06/04/2009 04:02 PM -----

From:	Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	P2 developer discussions <p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/04/2009 03:29 PM
Subject:	[p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF

---




Greetings,

In preference to previously created builds, please use the ECF build
described here

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219499#c131

for the platform RC4+0 build occurring later today.

This build was done (in preference to build done yesterday 6/3) in order
to deal with the issue described in
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219499#c125

Thanks,

Scott
_______________________________________________
p2-dev mailing list
p2-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/p2-dev




---


_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev

_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc