Re: [eclipse-pmc] Request for 3.5M5 rebuild

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

If you all keep re-building M5, you are just making it harder for the rest of us to find a reason we'll need an M5a.

But, don't worry, we'll keep trying and I'm sure we'll find something to satisfy this traditional requirement . :)

<just a little late night humor -- we do appreciate you taking care to get it to high quality.>




Mike Wilson ---02/02/2009 03:19:25 PM---I'd like to see this fixed for M5. +1. McQ.

From:	Mike Wilson <Mike_Wilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	02/02/2009 03:19 PM
Subject:	Re: [eclipse-pmc] Request for 3.5M5 rebuild
Sent by:	eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I'd like to see this fixed for M5. +1.

McQ.

Chris Aniszczyk ---02/02/2009 15:11:39---The PDE team found a regression with testing the 3.5M5 builds today. The problem is described in thi

From:	Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	02/02/2009 15:11
Subject:	[eclipse-pmc] Request for 3.5M5 rebuild

---

The PDE team found a regression with testing the 3.5M5 builds today. The problem is described in this bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=262498

In summary, if you use Eclipse application configurations... and select a subset of bundles AND simpleconfigurator is included in that list, we will attempt to start all your bundles. This effectively kills lazy initialization and can cause issues for people who don't expect everything to be started.

We are ready to tag if the PMC approves of this change. 

Sorry for the churn.

-- 
Chris Aniszczyk | EclipseSource Austin | +1 860 839 2465
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc


_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc