This is a good discussion fr the PMC mailing list.
- wiki pages are a good thing. we do this for the RT PMC, Equinox, p2,
... calls.
- good to put all topics there
- If there is a topic that requires prep, email to the pmc list is the
best bet IMHO
- for CVS perms issues, please enter a bug report to get your
permissions set properly.
Jeff
Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
Given that we're a small group,
meeting often and short, I like the lightweight organization without a
written-down agenda.
In most cases, it won't matter
too much if we're not prepared, because if we need to look up anything
we can start the discussion one week and continue the next; or, if we
anticipate that preparation is necessary, we can E-Mail each other
before the meeting.
I basically see two options here:
(a) keeping the current
organization, or
(b) doing a very lightweight
Wiki organization, for instance a single Wiki page to hold multiple
weeks' meetings, just mentioning topics as buzzwords.
Again, given that we're a small
group and most of our topics are reflected in the following arch call
anyways, I think that anything beyond that would be overkill. The
single wiki page agenda might help though as a "notepad" for
remembering things to talk about.
If we agree in the meeting
today, I can create
to hold notes.
BTW, I tried adding myself to the PMC page
but CVS didn't grant me write access on
/cvsroot/org.eclipse/www/eclipse/team-leaders.php
patch is attached for anybody who has
access.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber,
Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind
River
Target
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
The limitation with it is that it
is hard to come prepared about a topic you do not know about... so I
like the idea of the wiki you can look at in advance.
Also this would give our team more visibility into what we do.
At one point we discussed having open discussion of
PMC topics (on mailing list or wiki), but it turns out that there
sometimes issues that we need to discuss *before* we come forward to
the community. As Philippe said, collecting topics at the start of the
call generally works well for us as long as the topic isn't going to
take up the whole time.
McQ.
 Philippe P Mulet ---13/01/2009
11:02:36---Normally, we ask for topics at the beginning of the call. We
do not carry a wiki agenda, though we s
Normally, we ask for topics at the beginning of the call.
We do not carry a wiki agenda, though we should certainly do so for
increased transparency especially with you around now.
For PMC approvals, normally each owner of the code jumps in, but if you
feel strongly pro/against, please let know, but please consult with PMC
owner first (so we look like we speak one voice if possible).
Hi Philippe and Mike,
tomorrow I'd like to talk about
- Java6 as reference platform. It's
related to the UNC discussion.
- Who's triaging the "PMC Approve"
requests, should I too?
I wasn't sure what's the right way of
adding items to the agenda, so I'm mailing you privately first.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400
Courbevoie
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 609.751.783,30 €
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430
Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400
Courbevoie
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 609.751.783,30 €
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430
|
